Talk:AG5B: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Sorry if I stamped on some prior decision by eliminating the top (non-title) row in the second table -- it just looked like a duplicate of the heading row to me. Might it not be reasonable to replace the title row with the text below it if that text is preferred? -jabley | Sorry if I stamped on some prior decision by eliminating the top (non-title) row in the second table -- it just looked like a duplicate of the heading row to me. Might it not be reasonable to replace the title row with the text below it if that text is preferred? -jabley | ||
The purpose of the second line is to encourage people to fill in their information. But I'm open to suggestions for how to do that better. - sbw | |||
Revision as of 01:30, 23 January 2018
Why is it AA-1A, AA-5B, etc. and yet its AG5B?
They are all listed on the Type Certificate with a dash in the model.
The only time there is no dash between the letters and number is in the serial number.
Then the convention is AA1-0001 or AG5B-10001. --Bob Steward
It's my fault. When I began editing the AYA Star in 1995, I observed that the convention there seemed to be no dash, and I've continued that for all this time. I wanted to be consistent, and anyway, it looks better in print. I realize some of the official documents use the dash. --sbw
Sorry if I stamped on some prior decision by eliminating the top (non-title) row in the second table -- it just looked like a duplicate of the heading row to me. Might it not be reasonable to replace the title row with the text below it if that text is preferred? -jabley
The purpose of the second line is to encourage people to fill in their information. But I'm open to suggestions for how to do that better. - sbw
