Talk:Bondline: Difference between revisions
Bob Steward (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Steve Williams 2006/1/20 == | |||
Yes, we can add levels of hierarchy as necessary, as more content is added. | |||
I still wish MediaWiki had a categorization system that would build the indexes automatically. Oh, well. | |||
== Bob Steward 2006/1/21 == | == Bob Steward 2006/1/21 == | ||
Looks good to me, if we can finally get some operations content going. | Looks good to me, if we can finally get some operations content going. | ||
Revision as of 16:04, 21 January 2006
Steve Williams 2006/1/20
Yes, we can add levels of hierarchy as necessary, as more content is added.
I still wish MediaWiki had a categorization system that would build the indexes automatically. Oh, well.
Bob Steward 2006/1/21
Looks good to me, if we can finally get some operations content going.
I'd say that as we move forward we ought to have LESS links on the main page.
Why not just have "Operations" and "Maintenance" in place of the current list of maintenance topics, and those can all be moved to the Maintenance page. An Operations page can then list those categories and link to their pages. Its going to get cluttered if we have 20+ categories all on the main page.
Steve Williams 2006/1/20
It's not urgent, but I'm thinking of an organization something like this:
- Operations
- General
- Preflight
- Taxi
- Takeoff
- Cruise
- Approach
- Landing
- Parking and Storage
- Maintenance
- General
- Required Information and Documentation
- Logbooks and Recording
- Servicing
- Airframe
- Landing Gear
- Control Systems
- Powerplant
- Fuel System
- Instrumentation
- Structural Repair
- Electrical Systems
- General
Of course, you'll recognize the maintenance categories as those in the Service Manual.