Normal Procedures: Difference between revisions
From Bondline
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Abnormal Procedure: 1/3 flaps= | =Abnormal Procedure: 1/3 flaps= | ||
You may have read about Tiger owners disregarding the POH N.P. of no-flap takeoff and climb. These owners instead use 1/3 flaps and find it reduces takeoff roll and VSI | You may have read about Tiger owners disregarding the POH N.P. of no-flap takeoff and climb. These owners instead use 1/3 flaps and find it reduces takeoff roll and VSI climb rate. I tried this recently and was frankly <B>amazed</b> at how much improvement it produced in TO/climb. I'd like to know if there's any danger or downside to doing this routinely, and suggest that otherwise it be considered standard procedure. | ||
--[[User:Jw4fc|Jw4fc]] 13:06, 19 November 2007 (PST) | --[[User:Jw4fc|Jw4fc]] 13:06, 19 November 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 21:07, 19 November 2007
Abnormal Procedure: 1/3 flaps
You may have read about Tiger owners disregarding the POH N.P. of no-flap takeoff and climb. These owners instead use 1/3 flaps and find it reduces takeoff roll and VSI climb rate. I tried this recently and was frankly amazed at how much improvement it produced in TO/climb. I'd like to know if there's any danger or downside to doing this routinely, and suggest that otherwise it be considered standard procedure. --Jw4fc 13:06, 19 November 2007 (PST)
