<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://bondline.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jw4fc</id>
	<title>Bondline - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://bondline.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jw4fc"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bondline.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jw4fc"/>
	<updated>2026-11-11T01:11:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bondline.org/index.php?title=Normal_Procedures&amp;diff=2562</id>
		<title>Normal Procedures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bondline.org/index.php?title=Normal_Procedures&amp;diff=2562"/>
		<updated>2007-11-19T21:07:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jw4fc: /* Abnormal Procedure: 1/3 flaps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Abnormal Procedure: 1/3 flaps=&lt;br /&gt;
You may have read about Tiger owners disregarding the POH N.P. of no-flap takeoff and climb. These owners instead use 1/3 flaps and find it reduces takeoff roll and VSI climb rate. I tried this recently and was frankly &amp;lt;B&amp;gt;amazed&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; at how much improvement it produced in TO/climb. I&#039;d like to know if there&#039;s any danger or downside to doing this routinely, and suggest that otherwise it be considered standard procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Jw4fc|Jw4fc]] 13:06, 19 November 2007 (PST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jw4fc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bondline.org/index.php?title=Normal_Procedures&amp;diff=2561</id>
		<title>Normal Procedures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bondline.org/index.php?title=Normal_Procedures&amp;diff=2561"/>
		<updated>2007-11-19T21:06:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jw4fc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Abnormal Procedure: 1/3 flaps=&lt;br /&gt;
You may have read about Tiger owners disregarding the POH N.P. of no-flap takeoff and climb. These owners instead use 1/3 flaps and find it reduces takeoff roll and VSI reading. I tried this recently and was frankly &amp;lt;B&amp;gt;amazed&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; at how much improvement it produced in TO/climb. I&#039;d like to know if there&#039;s any danger or downside to doing this routinely, and suggest that otherwise it be considered standard procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Jw4fc|Jw4fc]] 13:06, 19 November 2007 (PST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jw4fc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bondline.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Jw4fc&amp;diff=2560</id>
		<title>User talk:Jw4fc</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bondline.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Jw4fc&amp;diff=2560"/>
		<updated>2007-11-19T21:01:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jw4fc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Tell me about it.  :)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jw4fc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bondline.org/index.php?title=User:Jw4fc&amp;diff=2559</id>
		<title>User:Jw4fc</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bondline.org/index.php?title=User:Jw4fc&amp;diff=2559"/>
		<updated>2007-11-19T21:00:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jw4fc: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;John Wiley lives in Santa Barbara, CA where as of 11/07 he&#039;s serving as MX Officer for the Grumman AA5-B Tiger N28870 in the [http://santabarbaraflyingclub.org/ SB Flying Club] fleet.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jw4fc</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>